« ILUG | Main| Compliance Isn't Going Away »

Corrupt Design Elements: Urban Legend or the Latest Political Scandal?

We were having this discussion the other day and one of the guys said 1 in 25 databases has corrupt design elements in them. I have seen them, but not in any database that has been regularly updated. Case in point--a customer sent us a database that was causing problems for one of our tools. Our investigation found that there was a piece of code laying around that was modified by a Mac designer client--no, not something new, but left over from 10 or 12 years ago. And we all know that Notes is famous for leaving stuff laying around. For example, put in a Hide-When formula, but don't check the box to use the formula.

I don't know if this is a good thing or not, but stuff gets left around. But my contention is that corrupt design elements used to be a problem, but the problem is less prevalent today, in fact, so rare that it is not found in modern databases. I do see more interest in the subject as people are looking to upgrade to ND8, which is a good thing. But by this point, most people have already been through at least one migration, fixing any corrupt design elements that had been left around.

But what is your experience? Do you still find corrupt design elements?

Category  

Comments

1 - Short answer - rarely.Emoticon

Post A Comment

Feeds

Custom Button Custom Button

Category Cloud

Disclaimer

The views expressed by the authors on this blog do not necessarily reflect the views of Teamstudio, those who link to this blog, or even the author’s mother, father, sister, brother, uncle, aunt, grandparents, cousins, step relations, any other blood relative - and sometimes not even the author himself or herself.

Comments on this website are the sole responsibility of their writers and it is assumed those writers will take full responsibility, liability, and blame for any libel or litigation that results from something written in, or as a direct result of something written in, a comment. The accuracy, completeness, veracity, honesty, exactitude, factuality and politeness of comments are not guaranteed. Oh, how they are SO not guaranteed.
en-us,en;q=0.5OFFCCBot/1.0 (+http://www.commoncrawl.org/bot.html)38.107.179.214www.getthemostfromnotes.comHTTP/1.180Lotus-Domino/tsblog.nsf/D6Plinks/TBAN-7F5RT6