Many Sides of Control
Some of you may have seen the recent news about IT Factory and their financial problems after filing for insolvency protection. (For those of you who may not know, IT Factory used to be very much involved in the Lotus Notes tools market, but had recently moved into customer relationship management, human resource management, online procurement and office automation applications. The really sad part of this whole thing is that the cause appears to be a CEO who ran a scam where non-existing IT equipment was sold to leasing firms, and the cash was sent off to some “offshore” companies. (The CEO is reportedly wanted by Interpol and is nowhere to be found!)
In spite of the fact that KPMG has been their auditor for some time, the activities of the CEO were hidden from them … up to this point any way. Bo H. Eriksen in his blog points out that auditing firms provide a needed service, but usually identify problems after the fact. In order to get in front of these sorts of issues, Bo argues for greater transparency. After all, this is a big part of what governance is all about.
However it’s more than just implementing transparency and control. Control without an understanding of the business doesn’t really help all that much. Understanding the business is also required in order to identify any irregularities that are taking place. It’s hard to argue that getting employees to understand their respective businesses better is a good thing.
The bottom line is that better control (aka: governance) with a greater understanding of the business can only help the business be better managed. With better management comes (presumably) a more successful business. At the end of the day, that’s what we all want, don’t we?
In spite of the fact that KPMG has been their auditor for some time, the activities of the CEO were hidden from them … up to this point any way. Bo H. Eriksen in his blog points out that auditing firms provide a needed service, but usually identify problems after the fact. In order to get in front of these sorts of issues, Bo argues for greater transparency. After all, this is a big part of what governance is all about.
However it’s more than just implementing transparency and control. Control without an understanding of the business doesn’t really help all that much. Understanding the business is also required in order to identify any irregularities that are taking place. It’s hard to argue that getting employees to understand their respective businesses better is a good thing.
The bottom line is that better control (aka: governance) with a greater understanding of the business can only help the business be better managed. With better management comes (presumably) a more successful business. At the end of the day, that’s what we all want, don’t we?
Category Best Practices IT Governance
Comments
Nevertheless, the demise of IT Factory clearly provides some entertainment for the masses(if one dares to overlook the human misery that follows).:)
According to Danish media the CEO nurtured relationships with members of Hells Angels and, in order to avoid the due dilligence from a likely sale of the company, tried to launch his own bid for the firm. Failure to accomplish this apparently led him to escape the legal consequences of his actions.
Posted by Bo H. Eriksen At 08:58:02 AM On 12/03/2008 | - Website - |
I'm sure this isn't the end of this story.
Scott
Posted by Scott Johnsen At 10:25:02 AM On 12/03/2008 | - Website - |
But at least he is "super sorry".
Posted by Scott Johnsen At 07:48:54 AM On 12/15/2008 | - Website - |